Admin Caucus tries to rig UAW election

Update 4/30: Great news!  Due to the pressure that more than 50 of our AWDU comrades have put on the leadership, physically heading to LA from all over the state, it now looks like Berkeley votes will be counted.  However, the battle isn’t over.  All kinds of other challenges are looming, above all the possible discounting of hundreds of votes from other UC campuses.  Keep up the pressure!  Solidarity with everyone down at UCLA having to deal with these Administration Caucus/USEJ bureaucrats!


–Kyle Arnone, UCLA, Candidate for statewide Trustee
–Charlie Eaton, UC Berkeley, Candidate for statewide Financial
–Jessica Taal, UC Davis, Candidate for UC Davis Head Steward
–Jennifer Tucker, UC Berkeley Unit Chair, candidate for re-election,
and former Elections Committee Member

In the wake of a hotly contested election for leadership UAW local
2865, reports from inside the vote count indicate UAW officials may be
trying to steal the election. The count is unfolding currently in Los
Angeles, where one member has challenged every box of
ballots from UC Berkeley on fabricated grounds. The ballots being
challenged represent 25% of all votes cast: about 800 of approximately
3,200 total votes in this election. The challenge threatens to
disenfranchise every voter on the campus with the union’s largest
membership. UAW local 2865 represents over 12,000 Academic Student
Employees across the UC system.

UC Berkeley is a stronghold for Academic Workers for a Democratic
Union, the reform caucus that is challenging the incumbent leadership.
The incumbents recently re-branded themselves as USEJ – United for
Social and Economic Justice. As of publication, it is unclear whether
the 60 AWDU candidates in this election are winning in the tally. But
it is clear that the strategy of the USEJ is to use their muscle —
including their majority position on the local’s elections committee
which has decision-making power over vote challenges — to try to
squash the power of AWDU members. AWDU has organized on all 9

The tally is underway at the UCLA UAW 2865 office, located at 900
Hilgard Suite 312 at the corner of Le Conte, in Los Angeles.

According to Charlie Eaton, the AWDU candidate for financial
secretary, who is present at the vote tally, USEJ-affiliated Des
Harmon has been allowed to challenge hundreds of ballots. This itself
may be in violation of union rules about vote challenges. Harmon’s
legitimacy as a challenger is in question because he not a graduate
student, not a teaching assistant, and not a union member in good
standing. In the February vacancy elections, Harmon ran as a USEJ
candidate for Trustee.

AWDU members on the local’s elections committee have been working for
months to make the vote fair and transparent. Supporters of USEJ
repeatedly blocked changes to the local’s election rules that AWDU
contends would make UAW 2865 elections more transparent. In fact, at
the most recent meeting of the Local’s Joint Council, USEJ members
voted to adjourn the meeting rather than allow a debate to be held on
election protocols and guidelines.

AWDU encourages the media to contact UAW local 2865 incumbent
President Daraka Larimore-Hall at 805.403.8183 and ask why he is
having members of his administration attempt to void the votes and
voices of hundreds of members.

For background on the election, and what’s at stake, please see the
following links:

Read more about AWDU here.


3 responses to “Admin Caucus tries to rig UAW election

  1. Pingback: “Ten Theses on the Proliferation of Egocrats”, UAW edition! « Orange Crisis

  2. Please take down Daraka;’s number. I understand your frustration, and urge to share it with him. I do not think that blowing up his cell is a responsible way to respond to the current insanity. I would like to see some prominent members from both sides sit down to a video recorded discussion about all the things that happened in this election process so we can get an accounting. And if that does happen, do you really want to be that guy who gave out his personal number without his permission? How would you feel if he gave out yours?

  3. “That guy”? This letter is available all over the internet; we just reposted it. As long as the other copies continue to exist, we will not remove it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s